Week #3 Principles of Good Social Media
Design: Comparing Websites
Good/Bad website designs
What was done poorly…
http://tectorch.com Is not a good
design layout. When you first visit the
page you are greeted with the history of the company. It is a lot of information to scroll through
before you reach the actual products the website is offering. Next, you have what welders have to say about
the products. This should go at the
bottom of the page after the featured products.
Finally, the page should be laid out more to where you can click the
links to get to the history of the company, or any other sub category so
everything is not thrown on to one page and the shopper has to decipher the
page to get what they want.
http://www.richsoil.com/raising-chickens.jsp
is not a good design layout either. There is way too much information with barely
any breaks in the text. Each category
should be given its own page and a link to.
There is no structure to the page, just the author’s opinion on raising
chickens. It is not pleasing to the eye,
and it takes effort to figure out what you are looking at. Although there is a lot of good information
in this website, but to a beginner looking for information on how to raise
chickens, this is very difficult to get through.
What was done
correctly…
http://www.ford.com/
is another pleasant, well structured website.
The main page is setup easy and is only one page. It has a nice balance of text and the
picture. There is not a lot of
information thrown at you on the page.
Everything you would want to find out about the vehicles and Ford in
general has their own clickable link to take you to a specific topic. This is a simple, easy to navigate site. At first glance of the site, I would probably
stick around and explore the site if I was in the market to purchase a Ford,
because of the easy usability of the site.
No comments:
Post a Comment